Just a note to say that I think those of us working in universities should be defending the terms ‘hack’, ‘hacker‘ and ‘hacking’. Hacking has had some really bad press recently and as a consequence is terribly mis-understood, but is a term that was born out of the work ethic of pioneering academics and a practice that’s still worth defending. The history of EdTech has its roots in hacking culture. Stand up for it! Stand up for the Hackers!*
hacker: n.[originally, someone who makes furniture with an axe]
- A person who enjoys exploring the details of programmable systems and how to stretch their capabilities, as opposed to most users, who prefer to learn only the minimum necessary. RFC1392, the Internet Users’ Glossary, usefully amplifies this as: A person who delights in having an intimate understanding of the internal workings of a system, computers and computer networks in particular.
- One who programs enthusiastically (even obsessively) or who enjoys programming rather than just theorizing about programming.
- A person capable of appreciating hack value.
- A person who is good at programming quickly.
- An expert at a particular program, or one who frequently does work using it or on it; as in ‘a Unix hacker’. (Definitions 1 through 5 are correlated, and people who fit them congregate.)
- An expert or enthusiast of any kind. One might be an astronomy hacker, for example.
- One who enjoys the intellectual challenge of creatively overcoming or circumventing limitations.
- [deprecated] A malicious meddler who tries to discover sensitive information by poking around. Hence password hacker, network hacker. The correct term for this sense is cracker.
The term ‘hacker’ also tends to connote membership in the global community defined by the net (see the network. For discussion of some of the basics of this culture, see the How To Become A Hacker FAQ. It also implies that the person described is seen to subscribe to some version of the hacker ethic (see hacker ethic).
It is better to be described as a hacker by others than to describe oneself that way. Hackers consider themselves something of an elite (a meritocracy based on ability), though one to which new members are gladly welcome. There is thus a certain ego satisfaction to be had in identifying yourself as a hacker (but if you claim to be one and are not, you’ll quickly be labeled bogus). See also geek, wannabee.
This term seems to have been first adopted as a badge in the 1960s by the hacker culture surrounding TMRC and the MIT AI Lab. We have a report that it was used in a sense close to this entry’s by teenage radio hams and electronics tinkerers in the mid-1950s.
In addition to the links above, here’s some worthwhile reading if you’re interested:
- Graham, Paul. 2004. Hackers and Painters. O’Reilly.
- Himanen, Pekka. 2001. The Hacker Ethic. Vintage.
- Levy, Steven. 1984. Hackers. Heroes of the Computer Revolution. Penguin Books.
- Raymond, Eric. 1996. The New Hacker’s Dictionary. MIT Press.
- Soderberg, Johan. 2008. Hacking Capitalism. The Free and Open Source Software Movement. Routledge.
- Thomas, Douglas. 2002. Hacker Culture. University of Minnesota Press.
- Wark, McKenzie. 2004. A Hacker Manifesto. Harvard University Press.
* Dedicated to Jim Groom, Tony Hirst, Alex Bilbie and Nick Jackson. Fine Hackers working in universities today.
4 Replies to “Hacking as an academic practice”
Nice post Joss, to add to your reading list I would highly reocmmend Becky Hogge’s book on the topic, my personal review here:
I think there’s a lot more to say about the relationship between hacking and universities, too, but I first wanted to get this short statement off my chest.
Thanks for the book recommendation. I already had it on my Kindle after you recommended it over Twitter 🙂
Comments are closed.